Cooking, Baking & Brewing Food Cost, Yield & Menu Pricing Culinary yield-test method (AP/EP)

Edible Portion (EP) Cost Calculator

The price on the invoice is not what your food costs. Trim, bone and peel are weight you pay for and never serve, and cooking drives off more. This calculator divides the as-purchased price by the trim yield to get the edible portion cost per pound, divides again by the cooking yield to get the cost of a pound as it reaches the plate, and multiplies by your portion size to give a defensible cost per serving. It also tells you the trim premium as a percentage and the as-purchased weight to buy for a production run.

Calculator

This calculator runs in your browser. Enable JavaScript for live results — the inputs, formula and worked example below remain fully readable without it.

Inputs this calculator takes, with typical values
InputWhat to enterExample
As-purchased priceThe invoice price per unit of as-purchased weight, straight off the delivery docket.6 $/lb
Trim yieldEdible weight as a percentage of as-purchased weight, measured by a yield test; use 100% for portion-cut product.75 %
Cooking lossWeight lost in cooking, as a percentage of the raw trimmed weight; set to 0 for items served raw or portioned raw.20 %
Portion size as servedThe cooked weight that goes on the plate, not the raw weight you portion from.6 oz
Portions to produceHow many portions the production run has to deliver, used to size the order and its cost.100

It returns

  • Edible portion cost per pound — What a pound of trimmed, raw product costs once you account for what you threw away.
  • Cost per pound as served — Edible portion cost with cooking loss added back.
  • Cost per portion
  • Premium over the invoice price
  • As-purchased weight to buy
  • Ingredient cost of the run
  • Edible portion cost per kilogram

The formula

CEP=CAPY
Cserved=CAPY(1S)

In plain text: EP cost = AP cost ÷ Y; served cost = EP cost ÷ (1 − S); portion cost = served cost × oz ÷ 16

  • C_EPEdible portion cost per pound or kilogram ($/lb)
  • C_APAs-purchased price from the invoice ($/lb)
  • YTrim yield as a decimal (EP weight ÷ AP weight) (decimal)
  • SCooking loss as a decimal, measured against the raw trimmed weight (decimal)

Both adjustments are divisions, never multiplications. Trim yield and cooking yield multiply together, so the combined divisor is Y × (1 − S).

Updated Category Food Cost, Yield & Menu Pricing Verified against published test cases Reading time 10 min

Why the invoice price is the wrong number for costing

You buy weight and you sell portions, and the two are never the same weight. A case of bone-in pork shoulder at $2.40 a pound arrives with bone, sinew and a fat cap that you will not serve. Whatever survives the knife then goes into an oven and loses more to evaporation and rendered fat. The price you paid still has to be recovered from the food that reaches the plate, so the true cost of that food is higher than the invoice — sometimes by a little, often by half again.

Edible portion cost is that adjusted figure: the invoice price divided by the trim yield. It is the number a costing sheet should carry for any item you fabricate. Divide once more by the cooking yield and you get the cost of a pound as it is actually served, which is the number a portion cost should be built from when you portion after cooking.

The correction is not cosmetic. At a 75% yield and a 20% cooking loss — the values this calculator loads with — the cost per served pound is 1.67 times the invoice price. Cost that item at the invoice price and every plate containing it is understated by 40% of its true ingredient cost, on a sheet whose arithmetic is otherwise perfect.

Two divisions, in order, and why they are never multiplications

EP cost = AP cost ÷ trim yield. If 75% of the case is usable, the money you spent is spread over 75% of the weight, so each usable pound carries 1 ÷ 0.75 = 1.333 times the invoice price. The instinct to add the 25% loss is wrong and always understates: adding gives 1.25, dividing gives 1.333.

Served cost = EP cost ÷ (1 − cooking loss). The same logic on the second loss. A 20% cooking loss means a pound of trimmed raw product becomes 0.8 lb of cooked food, so cooked food costs 1 ÷ 0.8 = 1.25 times the EP cost.

The two yields multiply, they do not add. A 75% trim yield followed by a 20% cooking loss delivers 0.75 × 0.80 = 60% of the purchase weight to the plate, so the combined premium is 1 ÷ 0.60 = 1.667. Adding the losses (25% + 20% = 45%, implying a 55% survival) would give 1.818 and over-cost the dish. Order matters conceptually: the trim yield applies to what the supplier delivered, and the cooking loss applies to what came off your bench.

Portion cost = served cost × portion oz ÷ 16, because there are sixteen ounces in a pound. Enter the portion as it is plated. If you portion raw — a 7 oz raw steak that plates at 5.5 oz — then set the cooking loss to zero here and use the raw portion weight, because you are buying and portioning the same state of the product.

Where does the trim yield come from? A yield test. Weigh a case in, break it down, weigh what is usable, divide. The food yield percentage calculator runs that test and produces exactly the percentage this calculator consumes.

Worked example: whole beef top sirloin butt at $6.00/lb for a 100-cover service

These are the calculator's default values. A whole top sirloin butt costs $6.00 a pound as purchased. Your yield test returned 75% after removing the fat cap and the side muscle, and weighing the roasting pans in and out gave a 20% cooking loss. Service is 100 covers at a 6 oz plated portion.

  1. Edible portion cost. 6.00 ÷ 0.75 = $8.00 per usable pound. That is the price of the trimmed loin, and it is what the recipe sheet should carry.
  2. Cost per pound as served. 8.00 ÷ (1 − 0.20) = 8.00 ÷ 0.80 = $10.00 per cooked pound.
  3. Cost per portion. 10.00 × 6 ÷ 16 = $3.75 a plate.
  4. Premium over the invoice. 10.00 ÷ 6.00 = 1.667, so trim and cooking together add 66.7% to the price you were quoted.
  5. Cooked weight for the run. 100 × 6 ÷ 16 = 37.5 lb of cooked beef has to reach the plates.
  6. Weight to buy. 37.5 ÷ (0.80 × 0.75) = 37.5 ÷ 0.60 = 62.5 lb as purchased.
  7. Cost of the run. 62.5 × $6.00 = $375, which is also 100 × $3.75. The two routes agreeing is the check that the chain is right.

Price that plate at a 30% food cost target and the beef alone carries $12.50 of menu price before a single side dish, which is precisely the conversation this calculation exists to start.

How to read the premium, and what to do with it

The premium output is the single most useful figure here, because it is the size of the error you would have made using the invoice price. Below about 20% the invoice price is a rough working number for a quick estimate. Between 20% and 50% it is materially wrong. Above 50% — bone-in cuts, whole fish, artichokes, anything sold with tops — quoting the purchase price at all is misleading.

The premium also settles buying decisions that price lists cannot. Compare like for like on cost per usable pound, never on price per pound. Whole tenderloin at $18.00 with a 70% yield costs $25.71 per usable pound; a trimmed centre-cut at $24.50 with no waste costs $24.50. The convenience product wins on food cost before you have counted a single minute of butchery labour. Reverse the yields and the answer reverses too — the point is that the comparison is impossible without this conversion.

Two adjustments make the picture honest. First, credit valuable by-products: if bones make stock you would otherwise buy, or fat renders into something you use, that value offsets the trim. Second, count the labour. Butchery time is real payroll, and it lands in the same prime cost as the food does — the restaurant prime cost calculator is where that trade-off actually gets settled, because in-house fabrication moves cost from one line to the other rather than removing it.

Cost multipliers for combined trim and cooking loss

The multiplier is 1 ÷ (trim yield × cooking yield). Multiply the invoice price by it to get the cost of a pound as served.
Trim yieldNo cooking loss10% cooking loss20% cooking loss30% cooking loss
100%1.000×1.111×1.250×1.429×
90%1.111×1.235×1.389×1.587×
80%1.250×1.389×1.563×1.786×
75%1.333×1.481×1.667×1.905×
70%1.429×1.587×1.786×2.041×
60%1.667×1.852×2.083×2.381×
50%2.000×2.222×2.500×2.857×
40%2.500×2.778×3.125×3.571×

Read the worked example off this table: 75% trim yield and 20% cooking loss gives 1.667, and $6.00 × 1.667 = $10.00 per served pound.

Do not apply cooking loss twice

If you portion raw — steaks cut from a trimmed loin, chicken breasts weighed before the grill — then your portion size already refers to raw weight, and the cooking loss must be set to zero here. Applying it anyway inflates the plate cost by the full cooking multiplier. Apply cooking loss only when the portion you enter is the cooked weight that reaches the plate, as with braises, roasts carved to order and pulled meats.

Assumptions this calculation makes

  • The yield is yours, not a book's. Published yields vary with specification, season and knife skills. Run a test and replace the default.
  • Trim has no value. If bones, fat or offcuts genuinely earn their keep, subtract that value from the run cost separately.
  • Labour is excluded. Fabricating in house shifts cost from food to payroll; this calculator only sees one of those.
  • Cooking loss is measured against raw trimmed weight. A figure quoted against the as-purchased weight will double-count the trim.
  • Portion control is assumed perfect. Real over-portioning shows up in your actual food cost, not on this sheet.
  • Prices are a snapshot. Recost when the invoice price moves, and re-test the yield when the specification does.

Where EP cost sits in the costing chain

Edible portion cost is the translation layer between purchasing and the menu. Upstream, a yield test measures how much of a case survives fabrication; the food yield percentage calculator produces that percentage and the ordering multiplier that goes with it. Downstream, the adjusted price is what belongs on every line of a costing sheet: enter EP costs rather than invoice prices in the recipe cost per serving calculator and your plate costs stop flattering the trimmed items on your menu.

For events, the same two yields run in the opposite direction to turn a headcount into an order — that is what the catering food quantity per person calculator does, using the identical ÷ cooking yield ÷ trim yield chain applied to weight instead of money.

Use a different approach where the losses are not weight losses at all. Bakers track absorption and bake loss against flour weight rather than yield percentages; bar programmes cost by the pour against a bottle's usable volume, where the equivalent of trim is spillage and free pour; and portion-cut, individually quick-frozen and canned items need no conversion at all, because their yield is effectively 100%. The rule of thumb is simple: if you throw part of it away or cook weight out of it, convert the price before you cost the dish.

Key terms

AP cost
As-purchased cost: the price per pound or kilogram on the invoice, covering every part of the product including what you will discard.
EP cost
Edible portion cost: AP cost divided by the trim yield, giving the price of a pound of usable, trimmed, raw product.
Cooking yield
One minus the cooking loss. A 20% loss is an 80% cooking yield, and the two multiply with trim yield rather than adding.
Cost premium
How much higher the served cost is than the invoice price, expressed as a percentage. It equals 1 ÷ (trim yield × cooking yield) − 1.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between AP cost and EP cost?

AP cost is what the supplier charges per pound of product as delivered, including bone, fat, peel and tops. EP cost is what a pound of usable product costs after you remove all of that: AP cost divided by the yield. A $4.00/lb item at a 75% yield has an EP cost of $5.33/lb. Costing sheets should carry EP cost for anything you fabricate, and AP cost only for items used whole.

Do I divide by the yield or multiply by the trim loss?

Always divide by the yield. A 25% trim loss raises cost by 33%, not 25%, because 1 ÷ 0.75 = 1.333. Multiplying by the loss and adding it understates every trimmed item on your menu, and the error grows fast as yields fall — at a 50% yield the correct multiplier is 2.00 while the incorrect one gives 1.50.

Should I include cooking loss in my ingredient cost?

Only when you portion after cooking. Braises, roasts carved to order and pulled meats are portioned cooked, so the cooking loss belongs in the calculation. Steaks and chicken breasts portioned raw are not, because the portion weight you enter already refers to the raw state — including cooking loss there would charge for the same weight twice.

How do trim yield and cooking loss combine?

They multiply. A 75% trim yield followed by a 20% cooking loss delivers 0.75 × 0.80 = 60% of the purchase weight to the plate, so the cost multiplier is 1 ÷ 0.60 = 1.667. Adding the two losses together (45%) would give 1.818 and over-cost the dish by nine percent. The calculator applies them in the correct sequence for you.

Is it cheaper to buy pre-trimmed product?

Compare cost per usable pound and then add labour. Whole tenderloin at $18.00/lb with a 70% yield is $25.71 per usable pound, so trimmed centre-cut at $24.50/lb is cheaper on food alone, and cheaper still once butchery hours are counted. Reverse those numbers and whole product wins. The comparison only exists once both prices are converted to the same edible basis.

What yield percentage should I use if I have not run a test?

Run one — it takes a scale and one delivery. Published tables are a reasonable placeholder for a product you have never bought, but yields move with specification, season, pack grading and the person holding the knife, and only your own measurement carries all four. Test your highest-spend item first; that single number will change more plate costs than anything else you could measure.

Does the trim have any value I should credit back?

Yes, if you genuinely use it. Bones that replace bought stock, fat you render, and offcuts that become a staff meal or a second menu item all offset the cost of the trim. Weigh them separately and subtract their replacement value from the run cost rather than inflating the yield percentage, which would corrupt the ordering arithmetic that uses the same figure.

How does EP cost affect my menu price?

Directly and proportionally. In the worked example the beef costs $3.75 a portion after conversion instead of $2.25 at the invoice price, and at a 30% food cost target that is a $12.50 menu contribution required from the protein rather than $7.50. Understating EP cost does not make a dish cheaper to produce; it only makes it look profitable while it is not.

References

  • The Book of Yields: Accuracy in Food Costing and Purchasing — Wiley
  • On Cooking: A Textbook of Culinary Fundamentals — Pearson
  • USDA Table of Cooking Yields for Meat and Poultry — U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service